🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid wider concerns about industry interference with public health regulations. In recent weeks, international health experts raised concerns that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to less than half “following international guideline limits”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the bill passes.

The WHO specifically advises a caution must occupy at least half of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for various offences “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia states the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

Chimbala said the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We live in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator said: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Additionally, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which provide for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that minors should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to achieve intended public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which involves growing volumes of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.