🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.