🔗 Share this article

Through a unsigned order, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to use a newly configured congressional district plan that is projected to include several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three decision, issued on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to set aside a lower court's block that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Court's Reasoning

The district court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disrupting the fine equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in explaining its action.

That lower court had determined that Texas had likely grouped voters by their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the boundaries. It had ordered the state to use the districts created after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Dissent

Through a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's action. She stated that it disregarded the work of the district court, noting that its decision was written by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a breach of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

The court's action is part of a nationwide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican control. Typically, boundary revision occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that are estimated to yield a number of more GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, for their part, have pushed back with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

In contrast, Democratic officials lamented the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

Another leading Democratic leader said the court had another time damaged its standing by approving a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.