🔗 Share this article

Following a notable regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a earlier ruling that prevented viewers in Australia from seeing video footage of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an order issued at the request of the online safety regulator.

Background on the Original Ban

After the death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in September, the eSafety commissioner petitioned the review board to assess and rate the circulating video. It initially ruled the content was "unable to be classified", a designation that empowered the regulator to instruct platforms to restrict access to the videos for an Australian audience.

Elon Musk's company filed an appeal for a pair of videos depicting the Kirk incident. It also appealed a similar ruling on a separate video—showing the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had also been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

Arguments Presented and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X asserted that the footage in question contained only a short moment of violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the focus shifted rapidly from the victim to the bystanders.

The social media giant argued the video was not excessively detailed, gratuitous, or offensive, stating it served as a factual documentation of "a significant incident of historical and political significance that generated extensive public discourse". The platform even compared the footage and the historic film of the JFK shooting.

The majority of the review board ultimately agreed that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. The board suggested that a longer or clearer version with alternative commentary could have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the panel changed the classification of the content to R18+.

A Dissenting Viewpoint

A minority on the board held a contrary view, contending the video was "content designed for sharing for the probable aim of amusement and/or personal gain (such as likes, shares, or views)". This view stated the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was flawed, as that footage was released years after the assassination, "once emotions regarding it had calmed".

Reactions to the Decision

Posting on its global government affairs account, the platform welcomed the ruling.

"X fought this decision to uphold free speech and the critical nature of public access about issues of public interest. Our commitment remains committed to protecting these principles."

Representatives for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the ruling, but noted that the revised classification now implies platforms "must take steps to ensure R18+ material being displayed to Australians who are minors".

Broader Context on Violent Content

In related news, the regulator has not issued formal notices to social media companies this week regarding disturbing videos from the recent Bondi beach terror attack circulating on social media. Officials commented that while the images were distressing, they had not met the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, platforms have been instructed to use warning labels and screens, such as blurring, on this material in accordance with their own content policies.